Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics |

Tag as favorite
EK Lecture Question 64
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
Vasil_5264
#1 Posted : Monday, June 08, 2020 11:50:55 PM
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/2/2020
Posts: 5

Thanks: 0 times
Was thanked: 0 time(s) in 0 post(s)
Hello,
For question 64, I thought that the reactivity of carboxylic acid derivatives was increased by the addition of electron withdrawing groups to destabilize the partial positive charge on the carbonyl carbon. with that in mind, I am wondering why this question says that putting electron withdrawing groups would actually stabilize the Ester, and make it less reactive?
Back to top
Report?
INSTR_Katerina_102
#2 Posted : Wednesday, June 10, 2020 1:10:41 AM
Rank: Advanced Member

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/24/2019
Posts: 250

Thanks: 0 times
Was thanked: 0 time(s) in 0 post(s)
Hi,

This question is contentious for me as well.

The mindset of the question is of the reactivity of the aromatic ring, not the carboxylic acid (as you need to be in an aqueous environment to hydrolyze the ester, and we assume that the compound is being transported as a dry solid).

The aromatic ring is reactive by the mode of electrophilic aromatic substitution, forming a carbocation in the process - when you make the ring more electron deficient, this mode of reactivity is less viable due to destabilization of this intermediate.

However, I would agree that the carboxylic ester is rendered more reactive by this. This question as a result is a bit on the ambiguous side.
Back to top
Report?
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Tag as favorite
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Clean Slate theme by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.040 seconds.