Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics |

Tag as favorite
EK ICE 2 Q 30
Madison_5056
#1 Posted : Wednesday, June 24, 2020 1:02:02 AM
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 6/4/2020
Posts: 1

Thanks: 0 times
Was thanked: 0 time(s) in 0 post(s)
I am not sure why the answer asserts that option II is also false. From what I can see on the graph in Figure 1, it looks to me like when the mice are missing the GCAP1 gene, they produce more cGMP than the wild type. If the mice are producing more cGMP without the GCAP1 gene, it doesn't make sense that this gene is necessary for normal photoreceptor recovery.

Thanks in advance.
INSTR_Shinthujah_68
#2 Posted : Wednesday, June 24, 2020 3:14:27 AM
Rank: Member

Groups:
Joined: 6/8/2020
Posts: 22

Thanks: 0 times
Was thanked: 0 time(s) in 0 post(s)
Hi Madison,

Yes, Figure 1 suggests that in the absence of GCAP1 there is increased production of cGMP. However, from Figure 2 we can see that in the absence of GCAP1 we see reduced RetGC activity in comparison to WT therefore we cannot conclude that GCAP1 is not necessary for normal photoreceptor recovery.

I hope this helps :)

- Shin
Users browsing this topic
Guest
Tag as favorite
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Clean Slate theme by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.092 seconds.