Welcome Guest Search | Active Topics |

Tag as favorite
NADH (3 or 2.5?)
Options
Previous Topic Next Topic
tiffyleung
#1 Posted : Thursday, July 27, 2017 8:36:50 PM
Rank: Newbie

Groups: Registered
Joined: 7/22/2017
Posts: 1

Thanks: 0 times
Was thanked: 0 time(s) in 0 post(s)
Hello! I was working with the calculations regarding ATP from nadh and fadh2, and used 2.5 for nadh (1.5 if in cyto) and 1.5 for fadh2. However, in the science workshop passage 3 question 12, the teacher used 3 and 2 instead. Asking another forum, they said to use 2.5 and 1.5. Can someone please confirm :)? Thanks
Back to top
Report?
chanseyveinotte
#2 Posted : Friday, June 08, 2018 6:31:42 PM
Rank: Instructor

Groups: Registered
Joined: 5/27/2012
Posts: 2

Thanks: 0 times
Was thanked: 0 time(s) in 0 post(s)
Hi There,

For the MCAT and from my own test taking experience and official practice test exposure - NADH yields 3 ATP , andFADH2 yields 2 ATP is what you want to keep in mind.
The AAMC will utilize 3 and 2 to cut down on the specifics and keep the focus on big picture type concepts and critical thinking questions. I have come across a view practice sets from other sources that have utilized the other ATP so you may find this as well. General rule - apply the 3 and 2 ATP counts first for any question that would ask this information of you. If your answer is not an option - you can try the 2.5 and 1.5 values. Again - I have only seen 3 and 2 ATP values come up on official sources. Based on occurrence chances are you may have one question on your MCAT (if that) that would require a calculation of ATP from NADH products.
Back to top
Report?
Users browsing this topic
Guest (2)
Tag as favorite
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Clean Slate theme by Jaben Cargman (Tiny Gecko)
Powered by YAF | YAF © 2003-2009, Yet Another Forum.NET
This page was generated in 0.077 seconds.